Ell because the ownership within the territory interested by the turbines plant (p 0.ten), offered that the hypothetical situation assumes the shopping for of all the lands interested by the project. Other essential aspects relate towards the opinions regarding the landscape’s relevance. Attributing high value to landscape in tourism Chenodeoxycholic acid-d5 Autophagy location option implies a larger propensity to donate to prevent the wind farm installation (p 0.05), as well as a good judgment around the rural local landscape (p 0.ten). Oppositely, the opinion that the collectivity need to protect the rural neighborhood landscape even when this involves considerable costs negatively impacts the propensity to contribute using a personal payment (p 0.ten). Finally, when motivations to justify the rural regional landscape protection relate to its aesthetic qualities that make MRS1334 GPCR/G Protein sports activities pleasant (p 0.05) and to leave it intact for future generations (p 0.001), the propensity to volunteer contribute to avoid the wind farm installation increases.Sustainability 2021, 13,13 ofTable 7. Estimates of Probit model 3–subsample opposing the installation from the wind farm.Variable Opinions about landscape relevance: Higher importance to landscape in tourism location option High significance to landscape in each day trip The viewing of the rural neighborhood landscape generates a pleasant sensation The care and protection from the rural neighborhood landscape is exceptionally vital The rural nearby landscape is typically positively judged The rural local landscape protection is required Collectivity need to defend the rural neighborhood landscape, even if this entails substantial expenses The rural nearby landscape is disfigured by components that should really be removed Motives for rural landscape protection: The rural local landscape really should be protected for the reason that its aesthetic qualities make sports activities pleasant The rural regional landscape ought to be protected simply because of its historical and cultural value The rural local landscape really should be protected since it is suitable to leave it intact for future generations The rural neighborhood landscape ought to be protected because it can offer you opportunities for the nearby sustainable financial development Respondent’s attitudes, habits, and opinions regarding the environment: Outside recreationist Agrifood tourist Organic tourist Social volunteer Environmental volunteer Donations Respondent’s profile: Age Male Educational level Employed Family members size Quantity of minors inside the family members Other employed inside the family members Ownership Revenue Constant p 0.ten; p 0.05; p 0.01; p 0.001. Coefficient 0.5739 0.3076 -0.1890 -0.3115 0.4691 0.3124 -0.2979 0.1196 0.3108 0.0972 0.6172 0.0248 Standard Error 0.2896 0.3360 0.1474 0.5241 0.2661 0.3988 0.1849 0.1514 0.1381 0.1693 0.1600 0.1545 0.1348 0.1863 0.1365 0.1403 0.1787 0.0002 0.0057 0.1318 0.0208 0.1626 0.0657 0.1000 0.1725 0.2353 0.0000 0. -0.0502 -0.5637 -0.5067 0.2099 0.2653 -0.0001 -0.0274 0.5351 0.0411 0.3876 0.0697 -0.1929 0.1408 0.4010 0.0000 -0. The results from the parametric models for computing the WTP for lowering the GHG emissions are shown in Table 8. In line with the Tobit model, the WTP increases using the years of education (p 0.05) and is greater for all those interviewed whose loved ones members possess a working occupation (p 0.10). The significance on the education level can also be confirmed by the other two parametric models. Table 9 shows estimates with the parametric models utilized for explaining and calculating the WTP for the conservation from the rural landscape. In line with.