2243 454 584 X2 = 399 X3 = -236 X4 = -521 X5 = -936 X6 = –1001 0 0 1250 1258 1802 JPH203 dihydrochloride 1102-1883 –
2243 454 584 X2 = 399 X3 = -236 X4 = -521 X5 = -936 X6 = –1001 0 0 1250 1258 1802 1102-1883 -158 0 0 -78 921 -26-2025 -1802 -1738 0 0 0 752-2000 -2140 -2075 -467 -363 0 0 –781 -1362 -1504 -26 259 1141 0Y1 = 0 Y2 = 275 Y3 = 392 Y4 = 1118 Y5 = 1196 Y6 = 2051 Y7 = 1429 Y8 =There are good numbers amongst the indicators, which indicates that the resolution obtained is not optimal. The cycle style leads to an feasible answer at a lower price. The first element on the good cycle corresponds towards the maximum optimization indicator. Inside a row containing an element of a optimistic cycle, the element that will have its equivalent within the column must be indicated. The process really should be repeated until the cycle is closed. The lowest value in the elements in the unfavorable cycle will have to then be indicated and subtracted from all components with the unfavorable cycle and added to all components in the good cycle. The produced cycle and the new feasible answer are shown in Table 12.Energies 2021, 14,16 ofTable 12. Cycle style and new feasible resolution. Cycle 18 6(-) 0 0 0 0(+) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23(+) 0 8(-) 7(+) 0 12(-) 22(+) 0 0 26 0 0 1(-) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 21 18 five 0 0 0 1 0 0 New Feasible Answer 0 24 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16The cost with the current option is e162,883.0, so it can be slightly reduce than the one obtained within the fundamental feasible answer, which implies that the obtained resolution is far better. By repeating the above procedure 12 times, a new feasible resolution was obtained. The feasible option and the final values on the optimization indicators for the northwest corner process are presented in Table 13.Table 13. New Sutezolid Bacterial,Antibiotic remedy and optimization indicators. New Feasible Solution 0 15 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 four 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 36 0 0 0 0 21 19 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 7 12 0 0 Optimization Indicators -6018 -9310 -4956 -2714 0 0 -2478 -1888 -720 0 -2903 -2313 -35 -5003 0 0 -472 -5829 -472 0 -2006 -5298 -4484 -2360 -4130 -8543 0 -1298 0 -1758 -3009 –1463 0 -1723 -3068 -2832 0 -7080 -0 -1180 -2549 -826 0 0 -4130 -All values in the optimization indicators are unfavorable, so the received answer of e102,152.0 is optimal. The final transportation fees as well as the outcome on the prospective process major to an optimal solution are presented in Table 14.Table 14. Comparison of strategies and expenses of options (e) obtained. Process Basic Feasible Remedy 1st improvement from the resolution 2nd improvement of the resolution 3rd improvement with the solution 4th improvement from the solution 5th improvement with the resolution 6th improvement on the resolution 7th improvement with the remedy 8th improvement from the remedy 9th improvement of the remedy 10th improvement from the remedy 11th improvement on the resolution 12th improvement on the solution NW 165,109.0 162,866.0 150,356.0 146,232.0 138,616.0 131,311.0 124,333.0 120,769.0 118,600.0 115,072.0 112,349.0 108,137.0 102,152.0 MKW 119,478.0 118,060.0 116,218.0 113,397.0 106,665.0 102,675.0 102,201.0 102,152.0 MK 114,888.0 113,931.0 108,991.0 107,213.0 105,503.0 102,201.0 102,152.0 VAM 102,152.As might be seen from Table 14, the presented scheme of optimization of your obtained optimal resolution was repeated: twelve occasions for the northwest corner process, seven instances for the row minimum strategy, six instances for the least cost inside the matrix system, as soon as for the VAM technique.Values with the transportation costs right after subsequent measures of improvement are il.